WRL Homepage WRL Programs WRL Literature WRL Actions WRL Employment About WRL

NONVIOLENT ACTIVIST: The Magazine of the War Resisters League


November-December 2000:
Nonviolent Activist Editorial
Freeing Burma
Acronyms of Acrimony in Africa
Radical Reading
Radical Literary Quiz #1
Letters

Homepages:
War Resisters League
The Nonviolent Activist

Freeing Burma

By Nisha Anand

Burma activists took to the streets of New York and Washington in September as the self-described “largest gathering of heads of state in history” met at the United Nations for the much-hyped Millennium Summit. At the Burmese mission to the United Nations in New York City, more than 80 demonstrators—along with an 11-foot fighting peacock puppet—assembled September 8 for speeches, street theater and protest in connection with the larger “People’s Summit” demonstrations of the day (see www.peoplessummit.org). On the same day, in Washington, where there had been vigils for weeks in support of the freedom of movement and release of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi and other National League for Democracy members, protesters unfurled a Burmese freedom flag with the fighting peacock emblem over the military regime’s illegal Embassy building. At the time of this writing, activists are seeking one million signatures from around the world for a petition demanding the unseating of the Burma junta’s U.N. delegation, which they plan to present to the U.N.Credentials Committee when it meets in October. (They also plan another round of demonstrations while the Credentials Committee meets.)

Aung San Suu Ky.

Colonialism’s Long Shadow
Although repression in the country is increasing, the current political, social, and economic situation in Burma (re-named by the military junta “Myanmar” but still called Burma by the junta’s opponents) is nothing new or surprising. A brief introduction to the country’s history sets the stage for the current situation.

The nation once admired for its fruitful land, its self-sufficiency, its high literacy rates and exemplary educational practices and its diversity followed a path similar to that of other British colonies. Divide-and-conquer strategies stirred ethnic strife that continues today. Imperialism gave way to isolationism after independence. Military and governmental structures foreign to the country were set up and, whether they were accepted or rejected, changed the nature of the country forever.

Under British rule, the Karens, Burma’s second-largest ethnic group, received preferential treatment over the more numerous Burman. The Karens were therefore, as a group, loyal to the British, while Burman insurgents struggled—sometimes with Japanese help—to overthrow the British colonial structure, fighting against their Karen neighbors for independence. In 1946, before the other British colonies, Burma won its independence. But on the eve of formal independence, the great leaders of the struggle, including national hero General Aung San, were assassinated before taking office. A shaky democracy was nevertheless set up and lasted until 1962, when military chief General Ne Win staged a coup. He and his Burman military cohorts have been ruling the country ever since, brutally crushing resistance by Karens and other ethnic groups.

For more information on how to participate in the Free Burma Movement and the UNseat campaign, see the Free Burma Coalition website at www.freeburmacoalition.org or call (202)387-8030.

In the 1970s and ’80s a pro-democracy movement gained strength, and in 1988 the military regime killed 10,000 nonviolent demonstrators and arrested and detained thousands of others, creating a refugee population that is now around 300,000. In 1990, confident in their ability to win now that all their opposition was either dead, in prison, terrified or exiled, the generals held an election. Their plan backfired. The National League for Democracy, headed by Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of the slain hero General Aung San and winner of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, won more than 80 percent of the parliamentary seats. The NLD leaders were locked up and brutalized by the military and never allowed to take office. Some of the newly elected members of Parliament fled and formed the current government-in-exile.

Missing: Human Rights
There are two interlocking problems that plague the country today. First, the ethnic strife that was played out during colonialism and after Burmese independence in 1947 has found its current shape in guerrilla movements turned self- defense armies in the ethnic border regions of the country. Secondly, the political repression of the junta—formerly known as the State Law and Order Restoration Council, or SLORC, and now called the State Peace and Development Council, or SPDC, touches the lives of all 46 million people of Burma.

The human rights abuses are well documented. Small non-governmental organizations such as Earthrights International, large NGOs like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, governmental bodies such as the U.S. State Department and international structures like the U.N.’s International Labor Organization have all issued well-researched reports on the conditions in Burma. Day-to-day occurrences at the hands of the military regime include forced labor for the military regime, child labor, political and extrajudicial killings and disappearances, rape and trafficking of women, arbitrary arrest, imprisonment, detention, and exile, denial of the freedoms of speech, press, assembly, and fair trials, and discrimination and even torture based on religion, sex, race, language, ethnicity and disability.

Grassroots Organizing
Again, this is nothing new—these abuses have been terrorizing the people of Burma for more than 35 years, and the international grassroots community has been engaged in various campaigns for the last 12. What is new, however, is the growth of the tensions inside the country and of the movement outside it. Education campaigns, solidarity actions, consumer boycotts, sanctions and divestment plans have been successful in raising awareness and undermining the military junta (see sidebar). In response, since Aung San Suu Kyi’s 1997 release from her seven-year house arrest, the military has stopped her every time she has tried to travel to see other National League for Democracy members. Soldiers stopped her twice this past summer alone, holding her and some comrades in a van from August 24 through September 3. On September 22, the military regime confined Suu Kyi and other party members to their houses, cut their telephone lines and barred most visitors; on October 13, the regime declared the NLD an illegal party and served an eviction notice on party headquarters.

Burmese solidarity activists believe that now is the critical time for international activism on a larger scale. The escalating repression of the NLD has led international governments to speak out against the regime once again. This time, the grassroots community does not believe words are enough. They want the world to take action.

In the spirit of the movement against apartheid in South Africa, activists for Burma are launching their “UNseat” campaign. In 1974, the U.N. General Assembly refused to recognize the credentials of the representatives of South Africa’s apartheid regime. Stating that the regime was a crime against humanity and not representative of its people, the General Assembly denied the representatives the right to participate in the international organization.

Similarly, the brutal regime that sits in the seat designated “Myanmar” was unequivocally rejected by its people in the 1990 elections. The regime rules by force and audaciously claims that its ability to rule the country comes from the international recognition of its rule. Burmese exiles and international activists hope to dispel this myth in the coming years by asking everyone in the international community to reject the State Peace and Development Council and recognize the SPDC for what it is: a crime against humanity.

SUCCESS STORIES

The Free Burma Coalition and other groups have worked to get international corporations out of Burma, in line with the call of Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy. Altogether, activists have forced more than 40 corporations out of Burma through boycotts, selective purchasing laws, investor resolutions, protests and civil disobedience.

Corporations That Have Pulled Out of Burma (partial list)
1992: Levi Strauss & Co., Petro Canada 1994: Amoco, Liz Claiborne 1995: Eddie Bauer, Macy’s 1996: Oshkosh B’Gosh, Heineken, Carlsberg Beer, Apple Computer, Motorola, Hewlett-Packard, Wente Vineyards 1997: J. Crew, PepsiCo, Northwest Airline, Anheuser-Busch, Texaco, Philips Electronics 1998: ARCO, Ericcson 2000: Best Western, ABN AMRO, Baker Hughes

Corporations Still in Burma (partial list)
Suzuki, UNOCAL, Adidas, Kohl’s, TOTAL

The Campaigns
Selective Purchasing Laws and/or Free Burma Resolutions (partial list)

U.S. Government: Amendments NO. 5019 - U.S. Senate Burma Sanctions Act (1996)

States: Colorado, Massachusetts, Cities: Berkeley, CA; Boulder, CO; Chapel Hill, NC; Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA; Madison, WI; Minneapolis, MN; New York, NY; Oakland, CA; Quincy, MA; Seattle, WA; Takoma Park, MD;

Colleges and Universities: American University, Bryn Mawr, Harvard, Northwestern, Penn State, Stanford, UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, University of Chicago, University of Oklahoma, University of Washington, University of Wisconsin at Madison

Protests, Vigils, etc.: Demonstrations at the Burmese Embassy and consulates, at Taco Bells and other PepsiCo-owned sites, at concerts sponsored by corporations doing business in Burma and at U.N. and city council buildings; Burma Freedom dinners and benefit concerts to raise awareness and funds; civil disobedience campaigns inside Burma and at embassies around the world.

 

WRL Field Organizer Nisha Anand is also Local Coordinator for the Free Burma Coalition.

 

WRL Homepage WRL Programs WRL Literature WRL Actions WRL Employment About WRL