| Freeing
Burma By Nisha Anand urma
activists took to the streets of New York and Washington in September as the self-described
“largest gathering of heads of state in history” met at the United Nations for
the much-hyped Millennium Summit. At the Burmese mission to the United Nations
in New York City, more than 80 demonstrators—along with an 11-foot fighting peacock
puppet—assembled September 8 for speeches, street theater and protest in connection
with the larger “People’s Summit” demonstrations of the day (see www.peoplessummit.org).
On the same day, in Washington, where there had been vigils for weeks in support
of the freedom of movement and release of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San
Suu Kyi and other National League for Democracy members, protesters unfurled a
Burmese freedom flag with the fighting peacock emblem over the military regime’s
illegal Embassy building. At the time of this writing, activists are seeking one
million signatures from around the world for a petition demanding the unseating
of the Burma junta’s U.N. delegation, which they plan to present to the U.N.Credentials
Committee when it meets in October. (They also plan another round of demonstrations
while the Credentials Committee meets.)
 | Aung
San Suu Ky. |
Colonialism’s
Long Shadow Although repression in the country is increasing, the
current political, social, and economic situation in Burma (re-named by the military
junta “Myanmar” but still called Burma by the junta’s opponents) is nothing new
or surprising. A brief introduction to the country’s history sets the stage for
the current situation. The nation once admired for its fruitful land, its
self-sufficiency, its high literacy rates and exemplary educational practices
and its diversity followed a path similar to that of other British colonies. Divide-and-conquer
strategies stirred ethnic strife that continues today. Imperialism gave way to
isolationism after independence. Military and governmental structures foreign
to the country were set up and, whether they were accepted or rejected, changed
the nature of the country forever. Under British rule, the Karens, Burma’s
second-largest ethnic group, received preferential treatment over the more numerous
Burman. The Karens were therefore, as a group, loyal to the British, while Burman
insurgents struggled—sometimes with Japanese help—to overthrow the British colonial
structure, fighting against their Karen neighbors for independence. In 1946, before
the other British colonies, Burma won its independence. But on the eve of formal
independence, the great leaders of the struggle, including national hero General
Aung San, were assassinated before taking office. A shaky democracy was nevertheless
set up and lasted until 1962, when military chief General Ne Win staged a coup.
He and his Burman military cohorts have been ruling the country ever since, brutally
crushing resistance by Karens and other ethnic groups. | For
more information on how to participate in the Free Burma Movement and the UNseat
campaign, see the Free Burma Coalition website at www.freeburmacoalition.org
or call (202)387-8030. |
In the 1970s and ’80s a pro-democracy
movement gained strength, and in 1988 the military regime killed 10,000 nonviolent
demonstrators and arrested and detained thousands of others, creating a refugee
population that is now around 300,000. In 1990, confident in their ability to
win now that all their opposition was either dead, in prison, terrified or exiled,
the generals held an election. Their plan backfired. The National League for Democracy,
headed by Aung San Suu Kyi, daughter of the slain hero General Aung San and winner
of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize, won more than 80 percent of the parliamentary seats.
The NLD leaders were locked up and brutalized by the military and never allowed
to take office. Some of the newly elected members of Parliament fled and formed
the current government-in-exile. Missing:
Human Rights There are two interlocking problems that plague the
country today. First, the ethnic strife that was played out during colonialism
and after Burmese independence in 1947 has found its current shape in guerrilla
movements turned self- defense armies in the ethnic border regions of the country.
Secondly, the political repression of the junta—formerly known as the State Law
and Order Restoration Council, or SLORC, and now called the State Peace and Development
Council, or SPDC, touches the lives of all 46 million people of Burma. The
human rights abuses are well documented. Small non-governmental organizations
such as Earthrights International, large NGOs like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty
International, governmental bodies such as the U.S. State Department and international
structures like the U.N.’s International Labor Organization have all issued well-researched
reports on the conditions in Burma. Day-to-day occurrences at the hands of the
military regime include forced labor for the military regime, child labor, political
and extrajudicial killings and disappearances, rape and trafficking of women,
arbitrary arrest, imprisonment, detention, and exile, denial of the freedoms of
speech, press, assembly, and fair trials, and discrimination and even torture
based on religion, sex, race, language, ethnicity and disability. Grassroots
Organizing Again, this is nothing new—these abuses have been terrorizing
the people of Burma for more than 35 years, and the international grassroots community
has been engaged in various campaigns for the last 12. What is new, however, is
the growth of the tensions inside the country and of the movement outside it.
Education campaigns, solidarity actions, consumer boycotts, sanctions and divestment
plans have been successful in raising awareness and undermining the military junta
(see sidebar). In response, since Aung San Suu Kyi’s 1997 release from her seven-year
house arrest, the military has stopped her every time she has tried to travel
to see other National League for Democracy members. Soldiers stopped her twice
this past summer alone, holding her and some comrades in a van from August 24
through September 3. On September 22, the military regime confined Suu Kyi and
other party members to their houses, cut their telephone lines and barred most
visitors; on October 13, the regime declared the NLD an illegal party and served
an eviction notice on party headquarters. Burmese solidarity activists
believe that now is the critical time for international activism on a larger scale.
The escalating repression of the NLD has led international governments to speak
out against the regime once again. This time, the grassroots community does not
believe words are enough. They want the world to take action. In the spirit
of the movement against apartheid in South Africa, activists for Burma are launching
their “UNseat” campaign. In 1974, the U.N. General Assembly refused to recognize
the credentials of the representatives of South Africa’s apartheid regime. Stating
that the regime was a crime against humanity and not representative of its people,
the General Assembly denied the representatives the right to participate in the
international organization. Similarly, the brutal regime that sits in the
seat designated “Myanmar” was unequivocally rejected by its people in the 1990
elections. The regime rules by force and audaciously claims that its ability to
rule the country comes from the international recognition of its rule. Burmese
exiles and international activists hope to dispel this myth in the coming years
by asking everyone in the international community to reject the State Peace and
Development Council and recognize the SPDC for what it is: a crime against humanity. SUCCESS
STORIES The Free Burma Coalition and other groups have
worked to get international corporations out of Burma, in line with the call of
Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League for Democracy. Altogether, activists
have forced more than 40 corporations out of Burma through boycotts, selective
purchasing laws, investor resolutions, protests and civil disobedience. Corporations
That Have Pulled Out of Burma (partial list) 1992: Levi Strauss & Co.,
Petro Canada 1994: Amoco, Liz Claiborne 1995: Eddie Bauer, Macy’s 1996: Oshkosh
B’Gosh, Heineken, Carlsberg Beer, Apple Computer, Motorola, Hewlett-Packard, Wente
Vineyards 1997: J. Crew, PepsiCo, Northwest Airline, Anheuser-Busch, Texaco, Philips
Electronics 1998: ARCO, Ericcson 2000: Best Western, ABN AMRO, Baker Hughes Corporations
Still in Burma (partial list)  Suzuki,
UNOCAL, Adidas, Kohl’s, TOTAL The Campaigns Selective Purchasing
Laws and/or Free Burma Resolutions (partial list) U.S. Government:
Amendments NO. 5019 - U.S. Senate Burma Sanctions Act (1996) States:
Colorado, Massachusetts, Cities: Berkeley, CA; Boulder, CO; Chapel Hill, NC;
Chicago, IL; Los Angeles, CA; Madison, WI; Minneapolis, MN; New York, NY; Oakland,
CA; Quincy, MA; Seattle, WA; Takoma Park, MD; Colleges and Universities:
American University, Bryn Mawr, Harvard, Northwestern, Penn State, Stanford, UC
Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, University of Chicago, University of Oklahoma, University
of Washington, University of Wisconsin at Madison Protests, Vigils,
etc.: Demonstrations at the Burmese Embassy and consulates, at Taco Bells
and other PepsiCo-owned sites, at concerts sponsored by corporations doing business
in Burma and at U.N. and city council buildings; Burma Freedom dinners and benefit
concerts to raise awareness and funds; civil disobedience campaigns inside Burma
and at embassies around the world. |
WRL Field
Organizer Nisha Anand is also Local Coordinator for the Free Burma Coalition.
|